Answering the questions of Radu Osipov, on TV Moldova1, yesterday, April 30, about:
- the exit of the United Arab Emirates (UAE) from OPEC and whether we have reasons for joy or concern. The decision will not help the markets very much because what is missing from the market is a much too large amount (13Mb/day), even if the Emirates would produce at the maximum now (4.8 Mb/day) instead of the quota that falls to them through OPEC (3.5 Mb/day).
- the exit from OPEC comes as a result of the accumulated tensions, especially with Saudi Arabia, the leader of the cartel. Establishing and respecting the quotas within the OPEC+ alliance is done at the expense of the sister states (Arab, Muslim). When you have to coordinate with non-OPEC countries (the OPEC+ alliance established in 2016) on the production side, practically OPEC makes room for barrels from Russia or Kazakhstan by restricting production in OPEC countries which thus sacrifice part of the production (not realizing income) in the name of "market stability".
- yes, by leaving the UAE, OPEC loses its flexibility, because only Saudi Arabia and the UAE have excess production capacity ("swing supply") - that is, the ability to increase production when needed. Russia does not have this capacity, having a rigid oil production profile.
- Why don't we feel the shock so strongly yet? Because the shock was amortized in March, when the US allowed India to buy Russian oil (from which India had just moved away, also under American pressure). Because the IEA decided to release 400 million barrels from the strategic stocks. Both measures work as an anesthetic and shock absorber. The exit of the Emirates from OPEC weakens the organization, but this is not necessarily a bad thing for consumers, because cartels have NEVER been good for consumers.
Read more »we do things differently
ROEC functions as a nexus between three “epistemic communities”: business, policy makers and academia